Legal Opinion

United States v. James W. Stone

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 22, 1993No. 92-8959PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARNES, Circuit Judge:

I. INTRODUCTION

A federal jury convicted appellant James Stone of violating 18 U.S.C. § 287 by filing a false claim for an income tax refund. On appeal Stone raises two issues that merit discussion. First, was it reversible error for the district court to charge the jury on “deliberate ignorance” in the absence of sufficient evidence to support such a theory? We conclude that any error in giving such a charge in the absence of sufficient evidence is harmless when the instruction itself requires, as a precondition to its application, proof beyond a reasonable doubt of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Marshall v. LonbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. United States v. SchleiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. BrazelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  5. Amal Eghnayem v. Boston Scientific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API