Wegener v. Wegener
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.
This action for divorce was instituted by defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, on the alleged ground of incompatibility. Plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, denied by way of answer that the parties were incompatible, and prayed among other things that her husband’s petition be denied. After hearing the evidence, the trial court first entered judgment finding that “* * * plaintiff is not entitled to a divorce from defendant and that the case of Wright v. Wright [Okl.], 303 P.2d 428, is in point and controlling upon the court.”…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hughes v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Rakestraw v. RakestrawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Forrester v. ForresterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Wright v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
3Cited by11 opinions
- Phillips v. PhillipsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- McCoy v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Waller v. WallerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Shearer v. ShearerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Berry v. BerrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.