Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Clarabelle K. v. Christman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 21, 1996Published

1ConcurrencePeters, J.

While I agree with the conclusion reached by the majority, I do so on different grounds.

Domestic Relations Law § 72 provides, in derogation of the common law, that under certain circumstances a "grandparent” has standing to petition a court for visitation with a grandchild, notwithstanding an objection raised by that child’s parents (see, Matter of Emanuel S. v Joseph E., 78 NY2d 178; Matter of David M. v Lisa M., 207 AD2d 623). Since such rights have only been conferred pursuant to statute, the terms thereof must be strictly construed (see, Matter of Hantman v Heller, 213 AD2d 637; Matter of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Emanuel S. v. Joseph E.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. In re Rita VV.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Santosky v. RoachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Hantman v. HellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API