Legal Opinion

Bignell v. Wise Mechanical Contractors

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1982No. 5929PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

The main issue in this case is whether an injured worker should be considered temporarily disabled under the Workers’ Compensation Act only until his medical condition stabilizes, or whether an employee may continue to receive temporary disability benefits while participating in an approved vocational rehabilitation program. This case also raises a question concerning the award of attorney’s fees in workers’ compensation cases.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Edwin Bignell, a construction worker, suffered a back injury in the course of his employment with Wise…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wien Air Alaska v. ArantAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Vetter v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Hood v. State, Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Gorman v. Atlantic Gulf & Pacific Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  5. Hewing v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Allee v. Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  2. Bailey v. Litwin Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Wise Mechanical Contractors v. BignellAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Forest v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Municipality of Anchorage v. LeighAlaska Supreme Court · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API