Legal Opinion

William Reese Johnston v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 22, 1964No. 7647PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant filed a motion with the District Court for the District of Kansas under Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and under § 2255 of Title 28 U.S.C. Under his motion appellant urges that the evidence at the trial was insufficient to prove all of the elements of the offenses charged; that the instructions given by the court were not given separately on each of the two indictments which had been consolidated for trial; and that the court submitted improper forms to be used by the jury in returning a verdict.

The District Court denied appellant’s motion without a hearing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Callanan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Gaitan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  4. William Reece Johnston v. United States of America, (Two Cases). Fred Charles Riley v. United States of America, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  5. Audilio Carrillo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Natividad Baca v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  3. Travis O. Spaulding v. J.C. Taylor, Warden, U.S. PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  4. John Joseph Putnam v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  5. Larry C. Glouser and Raymond P. Gearhart, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API