Legal Opinion

Streater's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 19, 1913No. Appeals, Nos. 127 and 129Published

Appeals, Nos. 127 and 129, Jan. T., 1913, by Edna Streater Pettebone and Margaret Streater, from decree of O. C. Luzerne Co., Year 1875, No. 566, dismissing exceptions to administrator’s account In re Estate of Charles Streater, deceased. Exceptions to administrator’s account. Before Freas, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. The court dismissed the exceptions. Error assigned was in dismissing the exceptions.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

By the account of the administrator of S. B. Sturdevant, the deceased trustee, as restated by the court below, the appellants will receive everything to which they are entitled. The matters of which they complain on this appeal occurred more than twenty years before the death of the trustee, and, if any fraud was practiced by him and his deceased attorney, it was upon Charles Streater, in depriving him of income which he ought to have received. He lived for twenty years after the alleged fraud was perpetrated, but never complained of it, and both appeals are dismissed on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Campbell's Administrator v. BoggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855
  2. Church v. WintonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  3. Kribbs v. DowningSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855
  4. Derr's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API