Liu v. Kell
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
John C. Coughenour, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Li Liu's motion for summary judgment on affirmative defenses raised by Defendant Keegan Kell (Dkt. No. 19), and Kell's cross-motion for summary judgment on the defense of res judicata (Dkt. No. 22). Having thoroughly considered the parties' briefing and the relevant record, the Court finds oral argument unnecessary and hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Liu's motion (Dkt. No. 19), and DENIES Kell's motion (Dkt. No. 22) for the reasons explained herein.
I. BACKGROUND
The following facts are…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cyrousi v. KashyapDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
- ASILONU v. ASILONUDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2021
- Belevich v. ThomasDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019
- Biton v. JacksonDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2025
- Fukita v. GistDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.