Legal Opinion

Perazzo v. Lindsay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 18, 1968PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

This proceeding, instituted pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR, seeks mandamus type relief against the Mayor, the Police Commissioner and the Commissioner of Licenses of the City of New York in the matter of enforcement of Penal Law and Administrative Code provisions and licensing regulations alleged to be the subject of general violation in the Greenwich Village area. The petition and supporting affidavits, however, fail to present any proper basis for the interference by *180the court with the discretionary powers vested in these public officials. The petitioners, as property owners, taxpayers…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of Walsh v. LaguardiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. International Railway Co. v. SchwabAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  3. People ex rel. Clapp v. ListmanNew York Supreme Court · 1903
  4. People ex rel. Clapp v. ListmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. People ex rel. Judge v. HylanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Vives v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  2. Young v. Town of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Bullion v. SafirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Alliance to End Chickens as Kaporos v. New York City Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. Bruno v. CoddAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API