Clark v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.
The state in this case does not insist that the road alleged to have been obstructed was ever established by order of the commissioners’ court or other legally constituted body acting for the public, but relies for a conviction on the claim that the road, admittedly obstructed by this defendant, had become a public road within the meaning of section 1397 (145), Code 1928, by prescription.
Not only is there no evidence tending to prove action on the part of the road authorities 1 regarding the road in question, but the evidence is direct and undisputed that the road commissioners never assumed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rosser v. Bunn & TimberlakeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Gosdin v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Whaley v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Cross v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Merchant v. MarkhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HerzigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. HerzigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012