Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Herzig

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 2012No. 20110304Published

1DissentMaring, Justice

[¶ 25] I, respectfully, dissent. The majority of courts have concluded the issue of whether a road is public by prescription can properly be decided in a criminal proceeding. I would overrule State v. Meyer, 361 N.W.2d 221 (N.D.1985), and affirm the criminal judgment. The holding in Meyer is not in line with case law in other states and forces the criminal court to decide if there is a “legitimate dispute” regarding whether the road at issue is a public road by prescription. Meyer provides no guidance on how, when, or by whom this determination is to be made in the criminal proceeding. The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. HoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. NesbittIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  3. State v. HutchisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  4. State v. MeyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. TeetersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API