Legal Opinion

Buzick v. Todman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 7, 1917PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Hamilton District Court. — R. M. Wright, Judge. Action for damages resulted in judgment against defendant, from which he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

The main street of Blairshurg extends north and south. Two streets intersect this street at right angles. The plaintiffs son and another young man, with a lady on ihe lap of each, in the evening of September 5, 1915, drove a 'single horse and buggy from the south into the main street, and proceeded north along the west side until the head of the horse had reached the south line of the street intersection to the north, when he first observed defendant approaching from the east, with his automobile. He pulled up the lines, and, as he stopped the horse, defendant’s automobile struck the horse…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Riepe v. EltingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  2. Baker v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Morse v. SweenieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1884
  4. Gilbert v. BurqueSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1904
  5. Cook Brewing Co. v. BallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sonnek v. WarrenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  2. Short v. PowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  3. Enfield v. ButlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  4. Claar Transfer Co. v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  5. Wedig v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API