Legal Opinion
Minnesotans for Responsible Recreation v. Department of Natural Resources
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 1, 2002No. CX-02-404, C8-02-420, C5-02-441PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
In a declaratory-relief action, the district court granted summary judgment for Minnesotans for Responsible Recreation (MRR) and ordered the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to complete environmental assessment worksheets (EAWs) on four off-highway vehicle (OHV) system plans developed by the DNR. The DNR and the two intervenors, the All Terrain Vehicle Association of Minnesota (ATVAM) and the Minnesota 4-Wheel Drive Association (M4WDA), argue on appeal that the system plans are not projects as defined by Minn. R. 4410.0200, subp. 65 (2001), and therefore…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ohio Forestry Assn., Inc. v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Wyoming Outdoor Council v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Terlecki v. StewartMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- In Re Conservatorship of SmithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- In re Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the 33rd Sale of State Metallic Leases in Aitkin, Lake, & Saint Louis CountiesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Re: Declaring a Negative Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Living Word Bible Camp Project.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014