Legal Opinion

In Re Conservatorship of Smith

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 21, 2003No. C9-02-667PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WRIGHT, Judge.

On appeal from a judgment in a conser-vatorship proceeding, appellant argues that the district court’s order appointing a conservator should be reversed, or, in the alternative, that a new trial should be granted, because the district court (1) erred by applying the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure and permitting pretrial discovery and (2) abused its discretion by excluding appellant’s witnesses from testifying as a sanction for untimely disclosing their identity. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant-conservatee Mary Larkin Smith (conservatee), who was 89 years old when this action…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Kroning v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Arundel v. ArundelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Peterson v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Nationwide Corp. v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Guardianship of DurandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  2. In re the Marriage of: Tamara Eileen Goemaat v. Andrew Joel GoemaatCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API