In Re Conservatorship of Smith
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Judge.
On appeal from a judgment in a conser-vatorship proceeding, appellant argues that the district court’s order appointing a conservator should be reversed, or, in the alternative, that a new trial should be granted, because the district court (1) erred by applying the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure and permitting pretrial discovery and (2) abused its discretion by excluding appellant’s witnesses from testifying as a sanction for untimely disclosing their identity. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant-conservatee Mary Larkin Smith (conservatee), who was 89 years old when this action…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Kroning v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Arundel v. ArundelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Peterson v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Nationwide Corp. v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Guardianship of DurandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- In re the Marriage of: Tamara Eileen Goemaat v. Andrew Joel GoemaatCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015