Legal Opinion

May v. Dermont

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 15, 1921PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by the landlords from an order of the Municipal Court of the city of New,York, borough of Manhattan, third district, dismissing the petition in a summary proceeding.

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

The landlord has brought a summary . proceeding to recover possession of a house leased to the defendant after the expiration of the defendant’s term. At the trial the petition was dismissed on the ground that the landlord’s remedy by summary proceeding was suspended by chapter 942 of the Laws of 1920. That statute provides that in view of the existing public emergency no summary proceeding “ shall be maintainable to recover the possession of real property * * * occupied for dwelling purposes ’ ’ except in certain contingencies; and the only question in this case is whether the house leased…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schwarzschild v. WelborneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
  2. Jackson v. GreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  3. Nystad & Krassner, Inc. v. ZerbeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  4. Lingo v. WolfeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. Morgenroth v. EmertCity of New York Municipal Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API