Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Srader v. Verant

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1998No. 24136, 24235PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BACA, Justice.

{1} In this consolidated appeal, we review a district court’s rulings concerning motions to dismiss on the basis of federal preemption, Rule 1-019 NMRA 1998, and Rule 1-012(B)(6) NMRA 1998. Plaintiffs Srader et al. are individuals who suffered gambling losses in Indian casinos after the start of Indian gaming in New Mexico in 1995. 1 In the first case consolidated within this appeal, Plaintiffs sued a group of Defendants consisting of numerous financial institutions (Financial Defendants). These entities have provided banking and financial services to gamblers and casinos…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Azar v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Crutchfield v. New Mexico Department of Taxation & RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Gallegos v. Pueblo of TesuqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State Ex Rel. Coll v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Board of Commissioners v. Las Cruces Sun-NewsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API