Legal Opinion
Pimentel v. Deboo
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 27, 2006No. 3:04CV821 (JBA)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Maria Joanna Pimentel (“Pimentel”) is currently confined at the Federal Correctional Facility in Danbury, Connecticut (“FCI Danbury”). She brings this civil rights action pro se pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Pimentel asserts a claim she styles as “medical negligence.” Defendants have moved to dismiss this case on various grounds. For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I. Standard of Review
When considering a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, the court accepts as true all…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Davis v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
- Bowers v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Childress v. Midvale CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Castaneda v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
- Birch v. QuirosDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.