Bohin v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Shulman, Judge.
Appellants were convicted of distributing obscene material (selling two obscene magazines) in violation of Code Ann. § 26-2101 (a). We affirm.
1. Both appellants contend that the evidence was insufficient, as a matter of law, to support the judgment of the trial court. While appellant Bohin (as the clerk or cashier of the Harem Bookstore) admits selling on two separate occasions the magazines which formed the basis of the obscenity charges, he contends that there was, nevertheless, no evidence of his knowing distribution of obscene materials in violation of Code Ann. § 26-2101…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Skrine v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Whisenhunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Simpson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- 134 Baker Street, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Bynum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Benton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Keller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.