Skrine v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Justice.
Skrine’s single enumeration of error on appeal from his murder conviction is the giving of a charge which he asserts was burden-shifting under Sandstrom v. Montana, — U.S. — (99 SC 2450, 61 LE2d 39) (1979).
His jury were charged in language very similar to Code § 26-604 that there was a presumption "that a person intends to accomplish the natural and probable consequences of his acts..but, "I instruct you, however, this presumption may be rebutted.”
Submitted August 3, 1979 Decided October 23, 1979.
The judge further charged, "I also instruct you a person will not be presumed to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
3Cited by79 opinions
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Moses v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Franklin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Blankenship v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Charles Thomas Corn, Cross-Appellant v. Walter Zant, Warden, Jackson Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent- Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.