Legal Opinion

Howard v. Howard

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1960No. 9223PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WADE, Justice.

William K. Howard, and others, the appellants herein, were plaintiffs in a suit in the district court wherein they obtained a judgment on July 9, 19S8, that a certain deed wherein the property in dispute was conveyed to Mildred M. Howard was null and void for uncertainty in the description. Within five days after this judgment was obtained the attorneys for Mildred M. Howard served and filed a paper entitled “Notice of Intention to Move for New Trial” which stated:

“You and each of you will please take notice that the defendant, Mildred M. Howard intends to move the above…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morris v. RussellUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Taylor v. E. M. Royle Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Crystal Lime & Cement Co. v. RobbinsUtah Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Lund v. Third Judicial Dist. Court in & for Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Watkiss & Campbell v. Foa & SonUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. First Equity Federal, Inc. v. Phillips Development, LCUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Yeargin, Inc. v. Auditing Division of Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Grouse Creek Ranches v. Budget Financial Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Armstrong Rubber Co. v. BastianUtah Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API