Legal Opinion
United States v. Bruno F. Sinigaglio
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 20, 1991No. 90-30109PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on February 5, 1991, 925 F.2d 339, is amended by the addition of a dissenting opinion by Judge Brunetti.
Judges Wright and Leavy have voted to deny the petition for rehearing, and Judge Leavy has voted to reject the suggestion for a rehearing en banc. Judge Brunetti has voted to grant the petition for rehearing and the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed.R.App.P. 35(b).
The petition for rehearing is DENIED and the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Agustin Gallegos-CurielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Edward D. Patterson, Richard L. Flintoff, Jimmie R. Oglesby, and Gregory C. MartinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Kenneth Joseph MasatCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Daniel T. HashimotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Bernard D. ByersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. Gloria Ann MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Sharon Ann RahmCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Copple, John R., an Individual Mechem Financial Incorporated, a Corporation, John R. CoppleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Rosario Montoya, United States of America v. Filiberto E. MontoyaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Robert W. HicksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.