Legal Opinion

Hulik v. Hulik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 4, 1994PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We reject the contention that Family Court erred in denying respondent’s cross petition for an upward modification of petitioner’s child support obligation. A court may modify a child support agreement that is incorporated but not merged in a divorce decree "upon a showing that the agreement was not fair and equitable when entered into, or that an unanticipated and unreasonable change in circumstances has occurred resulting in a concomitant need” (Merl v Merl, 67 NY2d 359, 362). Here, the parties stipulated to the amount and terms of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brescia v. FittsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Boden v. BodenNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Merl v. MerlNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Miller v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Rubin v. RubinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Strack v. StrackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Tuchrello v. TuchrelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Terrell v. TerrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Leroy v. LeroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Culton v. CultonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API