Legal Opinion

Okum v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 1983No. Appeal, No. 1688 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

In this unemployment compensation appeal, the referee and the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review denied benefits on the ground that discharge of the claimant was warranted by her willful misconduct consisting of an insubordinate remark to her superior. The claimant, Sandra Okum, seeks a remand for a further hearing.

The key question is whether or not the compensation authorities erred as a matter of law in excluding, on the ground of lawyer-client privilege, evidence which, the claimant submits, would tend to show that her superior actually discharged her for being…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Jenkintown Cab Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Alexander v. QueenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Fogg's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United Coal Companies v. Powell Construction Company and Interstate Equipment Corporation and Bethlehem Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  2. Heavens v. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Commonwealth, Office of Open Records v. Center TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Gould v. City of AliquippaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Sedat, Inc. v. Department of Environmental ResourcesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API