Mcmackin v. Ehrheart
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*131Opinion
MALLANO, P. J.
In a case of first impression, we are asked to determine whether a Marvin claim1 based on a decedent’s promise to leave her cohabitant a life estate in real property is governed by the one-year statute of limitations of Code of Civil Procedure section 366.3, and, if so, whether the doctrine of equitable estoppel can be applied to preclude assertion of section 366.3’s statute of limitations.2 We conclude that the Marvin claim here is an action to enforce a claim that arises from a promise or agreement with a decedent for distribution from an estate and, thus, is governed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Butt v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Bernard v. FoleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Ferraro v. CamarlinghiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Thea v. KleinhandlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Maxwell-Jolly v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Allen v. StoddardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Allen St. Julien v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Estate of Belmont CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.