Legal Opinion
American Triticale, Inc. v. Nytco Services, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 28, 1981No. Nos. 80-3068, 80-3114PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCON, Circuit Judge:
American Triticale, Inc. (hereinafter “American”) appeals the district court’s order of partial summary judgment for Nytco Services, Inc. (hereinafter “Nytco”) and Steven Franz on several counts in American’s third amended complaint.1 In granting partial summary judgment the court concluded that: (1) American was not the real party in interest pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 17(a)2 and, therefore, was not the proper party to maintain the action; (2) American had agreed contractually to indemnify Nytco against the losses alleged in the suit; and (3) the action was barred by…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- K-B Trucking Company and Keith Collins, Cross-Appellants v. Riss International Corporation and World Leasing, Inc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- In Re Peter Gottheiner, Bankrupt. United States of America v. Peter GottheinerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- In Re Larry Dean Kirkland and Billie Kirkland, Debtors. Security Pacific National Bank v. Larry Dean Kirkland and Billie KirklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Davis & Cox, a Partnership, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Summa Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. Chester C. Davis, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Summa Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee. Summa Corporation, Defendant-Counterclaimant/appellant v. Davis & Cox, a Partnership, Chester C. Davis, Maxwell E. Cox, Howard M. Jaffe and Martin Cook, Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants/appellees. Summa Corporation, Hughes Aircraft Corporation, Defendants- Counterclaimants/appellants v. Chester C. Davis, Davis & Cox, Maxwell E. Cox, Howard M. Jaffe and D. Martin Cook, Counterdefendants/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 926, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1384 William A. Steen Harold Hedlund Timothy Sandis John Heindel Lawrence Wlezien Wilbur Lockman Norman Neste, as Trustees and Land Surveyors of California Trust, and the Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors of California Health and Life Insurance Plan v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company Association Administrators and Consultants, Inc., William A. Steen v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company, and Association Administrators and Consultants, Inc. v. Robert Lemond James Wooten Daniel Ogden Milton Bell Robert Bennett David Lancaster, Trustees of the Texas Society of Architects Insurance Benefit Trust (Texas Trustees) Donald Melander Michael Wirtanen Arnold Lucke Robert Mayeron Thomas H. Stahl, Trustees of the Minnesota Society, American Institute of Architects Employee Benefits Trust ("Minnesota Trustees"), Third-Party-Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.