Legal Opinion

Executors of Burr v. Smith

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 15, 1835PublishedCited by 26 opinions

This was a bill in chancery, exhibited by the executors oí the will of Joseph Burr, late of Manchester, in the county of Benning-ton, and state of Vermont, who died leaving no issue, against Moses Allen, John Adams, Richard Smith, Knowles Taylor, Samuel Hickok, James D. Butler, treasurers of the several societies named in the bill, and Hannah Treadway, Daniel Kissam and Peggy C. Kissam, wife of said Daniel, James T. Burr, Peggy Burr, Mary Burr, Sarah Burr, residuary legatees…

Read the full summary

This was a bill in chancery, exhibited by the executors oí the will of Joseph Burr, late of Manchester, in the county of Benning-ton, and state of Vermont, who died leaving no issue, against Moses Allen, John Adams, Richard Smith, Knowles Taylor, Samuel Hickok, James D. Butler, treasurers of the several societies named in the bill, and Hannah Treadway, Daniel Kissam and Peggy C. Kissam, wife of said Daniel, James T. Burr, Peggy Burr, Mary Burr, Sarah Burr, residuary legatees ,of the will of Joseph Burr, deceased, setting forth the organization of several charitable asso~-ciations, to wit: The…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Williams, Chancellor.

The case before us is not only important on account of the principles which áre to be decided, but also as it decides the right to property of some amount. It was argued two years since ;• but the court did not think proper, on fhe first argument, to decide a case, where the principle involved was so important, and where the decisions in the several states on the subject had been in some measure contradictory. A change having taken place in the members of the court after the first argument, the case was again heard a year ago. As…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. TERRETT & OTHERS v. Taylor & OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
  2. Trustees of the Philadelphia Baptist Ass'n v. Hart's ExecutorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Bartlet v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ould v. Washington Hospital for FoundlingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Estate of HinckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Williams v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  4. Chambers v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
  5. Jackson v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API