Legal Opinion

D.A. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 13, 2009No. 4D08-2029PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDamoorgian, J.

We hold that it was error for the trial court to impose costs of prosecution pursuant to section 938.27(1), Florida Statutes (2007) on D.A., a juvenile who was adjudicated delinquent.

This is an issue of statutory interpretation, which is subject to a de novo standard of review. Kasischke v. State, 991 So.2d 803, 807 (Fla.2008). Section 938.27(1), Florida Statutes (2007) provides for the imposition of costs of prosecution, as follows:

In all criminal cases, convicted persons are liable for payment of documented costs of prosecution, including investigative costs incurred by law enforcement…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kasischke v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  2. V.K.E. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  3. A.M.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. State v. N.P.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wilgy Therlonge v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. J.R.B. v. J.L.B.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. S.D.J. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  4. F.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  5. Knowles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API