Legal Opinion

F.W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 5, 2010No. 5D09-2138PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this appeal from a juvenile disposition, the State concedes that the trial court *429erred by assessing costs of prosecution. See S.D.J. v. State, 21 So.3d 140 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009); D.A. v. State, 11 So.3d 423 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (holding that section 938.27(1), Florida Statutes, does not authorize courts to impose costs of prosecution on juvenile adjudicated delinquent). Accordingly, we remand with directions that these costs be stricken. In all other respects, the adjudication of delinquency and disposition are affirmed.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

SAWAYA,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. D.A. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  2. S.D.J. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. FW v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API