Case v. Alperson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BISHOP, J. pro tem. *
Parties who stipulate in an agreement that controversies that may arise out of it shall be settled by arbitration, may expect not only to reap the advantages that flow from the use of that nontechnical, summary procedure, but also to find themselves bound by an award reached by paths neither marked nor traceable and not subject to judicial review. That is the situation in the case now before us, with the result that we can do naught but affirm the order of the trial court that confirmed the award and affirm the judgment that followed it, with a slight modification. It was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sjoberg v. HastorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Sapp v. BarenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Crofoot v. Blair Holdings Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Pacific Vegetable Oil Corp. v. C.S.T., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1946
- O'MALLEY v. Petroleum Maintenance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Posner v. Grunwald-Marx, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Santa Clara-San Benito Chapter of the National Electrical Contractors' Ass'n v. Local Union No. 332California Court of Appeal · 1974
- California State Council of Carpenters v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. Superior Court of S.F.California Court of Appeal · 1967
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.