Hawk v. Jones
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a dismissal of an application for a writ of habeas corpus. The trial court h.eld that it was without jurisdiction to entertain the application, because, as its opinion discusses (Hawk v. Olson, D.C.Neb., 66 F.Supp. 195), appellant, a state prisoner, had not exhausted his possible state remedies, by an application for a writ of error coram nobis in the courts of Nebraska.
Appellant is an inmate of the penitentiary of Nebraska, under a life sentence by the courts of the State, for a conviction of murder. He has made other applications for a writ of habeas corpus, both to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Ex Parte HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Smith v. O'GRADYSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hawk v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Woods v. NierstheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Chaffee v. JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1964
- Hawk v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
- Nichols v. McGeeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1959
- Hawk v. HannDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1952
- Washington v. SmythCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.