Legal Opinion

People v. D.B.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 12, 1999No. 1-97-3179PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greiman

Respondent D.B. was adjudicated delinquent of armed robbery and robbery and committed to the Department of Corrections. On appeal, D. B. contends that his adjudications must be reversed because he received ineffective assistance of counsel where his attorney failed to make certain arguments as to the voluntariness of his statements to the police. D.B. also contends that the case must be remanded for a new dispositional hearing because the trial court did not have a written social investigation report.

In February 1997, two petitions were filed alleging D.B. to be delinquent. One petition…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. People v. AlbaneseIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. ThomasIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HorseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. SlywkaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  3. In Re DBAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. People v. SlywkaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  5. State v. HorseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API