Legal Opinion

State v. Horse

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 2002No. NonePublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] This case presents the question whether law enforcement officers can obtain a juvenile’s waiver of Miranda rights while in custody and proceed with interrogation without notice to the juvenile’s parents or guardian. Here, in an investigation for kidnapping and murder, police interrogated a fifteen-year-old without any effort to notify his parents. South Dakota law mandates that law enforcement officers immediately notify a juvenile’s parents, guardian, or custodian when a child is taken into custody, and we determine that a child’s waiver of Fifth Amendment rights…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Spano v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Owens v. RussellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. McCahrenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. FrazierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People ex rel. J.M.J.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. DiazSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API