State v. Horse
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] This case presents the question whether law enforcement officers can obtain a juvenile’s waiver of Miranda rights while in custody and proceed with interrogation without notice to the juvenile’s parents or guardian. Here, in an investigation for kidnapping and murder, police interrogated a fifteen-year-old without any effort to notify his parents. South Dakota law mandates that law enforcement officers immediately notify a juvenile’s parents, guardian, or custodian when a child is taken into custody, and we determine that a child’s waiver of Fifth Amendment rights…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Spano v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Owens v. RussellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. McCahrenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. FrazierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- People ex rel. J.M.J.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. DiazSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.