Legal Opinion

Maddox Bros. & Anderson v. Covington

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1895No. 224PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Obiginal application for mandamus.against Court of Civil Appeals for Second District. The opinion gives a sufficient statement of the ease.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Chief Justice.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the Court of Civil Appeals of the Second Supreme Judicial District to file their conclusions of fact and law in a certain cause in that court in which the judgment was affirmed on appeal. It is admitted in the petition that it is a boundary case; but it is contended that article 1011 of the “Act to organize the Supreme Court,” approved April 13, 1892, and section 5 of the corresponding act to organize the Courts of Civil Appeals, approved on the same day, which seek to fix the jurisdiction of this court, are in conflict…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. in the Interest of D.W., T.W., and S.G., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
  2. Seale v. McCallumTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  3. In Re DWCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  4. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. BlairTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  5. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. BlairTexas Supreme Court · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API