Legal Opinion

Acosta v. Echt

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 13, 1962No. 25956PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFess, J.

Appeal on questions of law from the entry of a summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees. Defendants moved the court to enter a summary judgment on their behalf “and in support of such motion, and in accordance with Section 2311.041, Bevised Code, defendants refer the court to ‘Exhibit No. 1,’ deposition of the plaintiff, and to defendant’s brief filed herewith.” Exhibit No. 1 is a carbon copy of a deposition of the plaintiff taken by defendants as upon cross-examination, which is certified by the notary public.

The journal entry recites:

“Upon consideration of the motion for summary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tenesy v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Allstate Insurance v. DyeOhio Court of Appeals · 1960

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Albreqt v. ChenOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Yarber v. CooperOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Rukavina v. New York Central RailroadOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. Ashland Oil & Refining Co. v. LytleOhio Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. PerkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API