Tate v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Presiding Judge.
Defendant appeals his conviction for two counts of unlawful sale of heroin in violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. Held:
1. The defendant contends that the state’s witness used to identify the substance sold by defendant "had not been qualified as an expert.” Whether a witness is allowed to testify as an expert is a question for the sound discretion of the trial court and such discretion, unless abused will not be disturbed. Rouse v. Fussell, 106 Ga. App. 259 (4) (126 SE2d 830); Brown v. State, 140 Ga. App. 160, 163 (5) (230 SE2d 128). Generally nothing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Curtis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Rouse v. FussellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Frazier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Gilmore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dennis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Fatora v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Wooten v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Stone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979