Legal Opinion

Holm v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided July 1, 1982No. Court Nos. R67-1324-94, R67-1325-95, R67-1326-97, R67-1327-98, R67-1416-96, R76-4672-99, R66-25403-93Published

1Opinion of the Court

Watson, Judge:

The issue in this case is whether plaintiff has proved that export value under section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956,1 is the proper basis for appraising the cantaloupes it imported from Mexico through the port of Nogales, Arizona in the spring of 1966. The underlying questions before the Court are whether Mexican cantaloupes entered through the port of Laredo, Texas during the same period of time were appraised on the basis of export value and, if so, whether plaintiffs cantaloupes were such or similar merchandise and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. MassinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. WeckerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. E. J. Brach & Sons v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  4. Agricolas de Mexico v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API