Legal Opinion

Ex parte Thompson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1875PublishedCited by 17 opinions

This was an application for mandamus to compel the judge of the ninth judicial circuit (Hon. J. E. Cobb) to approve relator’s official bond as probate judge of Macon county, which the circuit judge had refused to do, because he deemed the sureties insufficient for reasons stated in his return, which it is not necessary to set forth here.

1Opinion of the CourtBrickell, C. J.

The judge of the ninth judicial circuit, upon the address of four members of the court of county commissioners of the county of Macon, required the relator to give an additional bond as judge of probate of said county. The relator tendered an additional bond, which the judge refused to approve, because he deemed the sureties insufficient. A mandamus to compel him to approve is moved for by the relator.

Unless the court departs from the decision made at the present term in Hx parte George JE. Harris, the application must be refused. We have carefully reconsidered that decision, and have…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kendall v. United States Ex Rel. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  2. Ex Parte SecombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
  3. LIFE AND FIRE INS. COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. Wilson's HeirsSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
  4. Arberry v. BeaversTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  5. United States Ex Rel. Goodrich v. GuthrieSupreme Court of the United States · 1855

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State Board of Administration v. RoquemoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Horn v. Dunn Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. Hutto v. Walker CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Dunbar v. FrazerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  5. Baker v. Denniston-Boykin Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API