Legal Opinion
Toscano v. Burlington Northern Railroad
District Court, D. Montana
Decided July 13, 1987No. CV-86-046-GF-PGHPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HATFIELD, District Judge.
This action, prosecuted under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”), 45 U.S.C. §§ 51 et seq., is before the court on motion of the defendant, Burlington Northern Railroad Company (“Burlington Northern”), requesting the court to enter partial judgment on the pleadings in its favor with respect to the claims advanced by Counts III, IV and V of the plaintiff’s complaint. 1 The issues presented by the motion of Burlington Northern are ripe for disposition.
EMOTIONAL INJURY UNDER THE FELA
That portion of the plaintiff’s complaint denominated Count…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nelsen v. Research Corp. of the University of HawaiiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1992
- Matter of Mardoc Asbestos Case Clusters 1, 2, 5 and 6District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
- ALABAMA GREAT SOUTHERN R. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Reidelbach v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2002
- Handy v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.