Legal Opinion

In re Perman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 17, 1916PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by the Beaber Tailoring Company from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 25th day of January, 1916, granting the application herein and appointing a receiver of appellant’s property for the benefit of the creditors of Philip Friedman.

1Opinion of the Court

Laughlin, J.:

The order was granted on the return of an order to show ■ cause obtained by Charles Perman on an affidavit showing that he was a creditor of one Philip Friedman, a merchant tailor, who incorporated the appellant and transferred his business to it in bulk without complying with the provisions of section 44 *15of the Personal Property Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 41; Laws of 1909, chap. 45), as amended by chapter 507 of the Laws of 1914; and it directs the receiver to take possession of the business of the appellant and to .continue it for ten days, and to liquidate the assets, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Touris v. KarantzalisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Murdock v. Plymouth Enterprises, Inc. (In Re Curtina International, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  2. In Re SchoenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  3. Gabbe v. Kleban Drug Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Braun v. American Laundry MacH. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1932
  5. Streamlight, Inc. v. International Health & Safety Corp. (In Re Streamlight, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API