Legal Opinion

DeCesare v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 5, 1932PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.

This is an action of contract in which the plaintiff seeks to recover as beneficiary on an alleged contract of insurance on the life of Frank DeCesare. The trial judge directed a verdict for the defendant on the sole ground that no valid contract of insurance existed between the defendant and DeCesare, husband of the plaintiff, at the time of his death on March 31, 1927.

The plaintiff in her declaration alleged that the defendant issued to Frank DeCesare on or about February 25, 1927, a policy of insurance on his life payable to the plaintiff as beneficiary, and that on March 7, 1927, he made…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. Young's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Gardner v. North State Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. NeafusCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. Sanford v. Orient InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  5. Cass v. LordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Stonsz v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Colorado Life Co. v. TeagueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Rapp v. Lester L. Burdick, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  4. Hyder v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  5. Earle C. Dodds Inc. v. Boston Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API