Legal Opinion

Streeter v. Young

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 26, 1991No. 1901300PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant, Gary C. Young, in a civil action brought by Samuel C. Streeter, who contends that Young was guilty of legal malpractice in his representation of Streeter in Streeter's criminal case. We affirm.

Rule 56, A.R.Civ.P., sets forth a two-tiered standard for determining whether to enter summary judgment. To enter a summary judgment, the trial court must determine: 1) that there is no genuine issue of material fact; and 2) that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56;RNH, Inc. v. Beatty, 571…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Turner v. Systems Fuel, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. Herston v. WhitesellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  5. RNH, INC. v. BeattySupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Steele v. KehoeSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Laurence v. SollittoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  3. Mobil Oil Corp. v. SchlumbergerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Orr v. Black & Furci, P.A.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API