Legal Opinion

In re Rikert

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided September 27, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. Vincent Grady, S.

Application has been made for the probate of the last will and testament of B. Baymond Bikert dated October 30, 1954 and a citation was issued to those mentioned in a previous will also filed who were adversely affected by the later will.

On the return date of said citation Northern Dutchess Health Service Center, Benson B. Frost, Esq., and Mildred B. Zegelbrier (Young), three adversely affected by the later will, appeared by their respective attorneys and demanded an examination of the attesting witnesses to the will offered for probate.

The proponent responded by moving…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of the Will of RoseNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945
  2. In re the Estate of CohenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  3. In re the Probate of the Will of AspenleiterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1946
  4. In re the Estate of AimsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of BayleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1972
  2. In re the Estate of BrumerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1978
  3. In re the Estate of TurnerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API