Legal Opinion
H. Muehlstein & Co. v. Hickman
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 24, 1928No. 7892PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judge.
Appellant is a New York corporation, carrying on its business at New York City. The bankrupt, Hannibal Rubber Company, was a Missouri corporation, doing business at Hannibal in said state. November 13, 1923, by proposal and acceptance, appellant and the bankrupt entered into a contract, the material parts of which are in the words and figures following:
“H. Muehlstein & Company, Inc., 114 West Van Buren Street.
“Contract No. C-761
“Chicago, Ill., Nov. 13, 1923.
“Crude Rubber Department, Hannibal Rubber Co., Hannibal, Mo. — Gentlemen: We have this day sold you the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Williams v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Central Trust Co. of Ill. v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Ziehen v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Florence Mining Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In the Matter of Erie Lackawanna Railway Co., Debtor, Appeal of Non-Contract RetireesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- Woodbury v. Pickering Lumber Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1933
- Rock-Ola Mfg. Corporation v. LeopoldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
- South Central Enterprises, Inc. v. Farrington (In Re Progressive Farmers Ass'n)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
- Wunderlich v. National Surety Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.