Legal Opinion

Glen Oak's Turf, Inc. v. Butler

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 7, 1989No. A89A0234PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Chief Judge.

After she was injured in an on-the-job accident, appellee-employee filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits. Asserting that it was engaged in the business of “farming” and that it had hired appellee as a “farm laborer,” the appellant-employer denied the existence of coverage based upon OCGA § 34-9-2 (a). That statute provides that the Workers’ Compensation Act “shall not apply ... to farm laborers . . . ; nor to employers of such employees. ...” Although the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) did find that appellant was in the “farming” business, he further concluded…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pridgen v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  2. Utica Mutual Insurance v. WintersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  3. Free v. McEverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  4. Ballard v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  5. Culpepper v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Butler v. Glen Oak's Turf, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  2. J & C POULTRY v. Reyes-GuzmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Lumber City Egg Marketers, Inc. v. PiercyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API