Legal Opinion

Dooner v. Haws

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 15, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

. Appeals by the defendant, Walter D. Haws, from a judgment in each of the above-entitled actions in. favor of the plaintiffs, the recovery by the plaintiff Dooner being for $256.82, damages and costs; and in favor of the plaintiff Curry for $132-79, damages and costs. '

1Opinion of the Court

Daly, P, J.

The plaintiffs in these actions are the assignees -of the claims of certain mechanics who performed work in erecting, reviewing stands on Riverside drive, near Eighty-third' street, in. the month of April, 1897, in preparation for the public ceremonies and procession upon the occasion of the dedication, of the tomb-, of General Grant. The mechanics were employed by one Chatterton, and this action was brought against him and the defendant Haws upon a claim that the work was done for them as copartners. There was no claim that the' work was done upon the faith of any apparent…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reeves v. BushbyNew York Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Antony v. DickelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API