Reeves v. Bushby
New York Supreme Court
Demübbeb to counterclaims. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
This action is brought for the winding up of a copartnership, alleged to subsist between the plaintiff and four of the defendants, which was formed for the prosecution of claims for damages to properties abutting on Park avenue, on the line of the new railroad viaducts. Three of the defendants are attorneys-at-law. The plaintiff is a civil engineer. One defendant agreed to furnish the services of a real estate expert, and the remaining defendant is alleged to be a creditor for money advanced for the joint enterprise to the parties interested. The plaintiff was to do all necesary work as civil…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- More v. . RandNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Corning v. RooseveltNew York Supreme Court · 1890
- Dooner v. HawsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897
- Boyle v. WilliamsNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892
- Brown v. DennisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gross v. GrossAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
- Smith v. SnowberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Rosenblum v. WestinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916