Gregory v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The petitioner, Marcus Gregory, appeals following the denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgment denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court (1) abused its discretion by denying his petition for certification to appeal, (2) improperly found that trial counsel was not ineffective with respect to his cross-examination of a state’s witness, (3) improperly found that trial counsel was not ineffective for not using an expert witness and (4) improperly found that trial and appellate counsel were not…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Lozada v. DeedsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. FauciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Vandever v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Gregory v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Wilson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014