Legal Opinion

People v. Y. Wong

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 23, 1923No. Crim. No. 659PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The district attorney of San Joaquin County filed in the superior court thereof an information charging the defendant with a misdemeanor, in that, on or about the nineteenth day of May, 1922, and prior to the filing of said information, in said court, said defendant practiced and attempted to practice and advertised and held himself out as practicing a system or ■ mode of treating the sick and afflicted, without having -at said time “a valid unrevoked certificate from the State Btfard of Medical Examiners of the State of California” so to do. (Stats. 1913, p. 722.)

At the time the defendant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Abeel v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Ex parte LiddellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Breckinridge v. CrockerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. People v. Sacramento Butchers' Protective Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  5. Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wallace v. ZinmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. In Re GamoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. In Re GuzmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. In Re Application of SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API