Legal Opinion

Glenna v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 27, 1976No. 45890PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

This is á malpractice action against defendant, Patrick F. Sullivan, an attorney, for negligently recommending that his clients accept an allegedly inadequate settlement in a personal injury suit. The trial court directed a verdict in favor of defendant. We affirm.

On September 12, 1968, plaintiffs, Mabel A. and Elmer 0. Glenna, were involved in a two-car collision at an intersection in St. Paul. After the accident Mrs. Glenna was taken to a hospital, treated, and released. On September 20, 1968, Mrs. Glenna consulted Dr. Clyde Warner, an orthopedic surgeon, because she was experiencing pain…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. Meagher v. KavliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Sjobeck v. LeachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  4. Nelson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Helmbrecht v. St. Paul InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Rouse v. Dunkley & Bennett, P.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Ouellette Ex Rel. Ouellette v. SubakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Cook v. ConnollySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Sanders v. TownsendIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API