Legal Opinion

Palace Laundry Dry Cleaning Co. v. Cole

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1945No. 250PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDSON, Chief Judge.

Appellant was sued by a customer for the value of articles left with it to be laundered. Its defense was that its liability was limited to ten times the service charge. Judgment was for the full value of the missing items and the company has appealed.

Plaintiff had been an intermittent customer of the laundry company for about eight years. Her dealings were with a branch office where she deposited bundles of clothing and linens, marked with her name and address, in a receptacle provided for that purpose. When she called for and received finished work she paid the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cordova v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Red-Cross Laundry v. TutenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shea v. FridleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. McCarthy v. CahillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966
  3. Manning v. LambDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Lucas v. Auto City Parking Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Hallman v. Federal Parking Services, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API