Legal Opinion

Red-Cross Laundry v. Tuten

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 27, 1924No. 14620PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Certiorari; from Chatham superior court—Judge Meldrim. April 9, 1923.

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. Where a laundry company, on accepting articles of wearing apparel from a customer for the purpose of laundering them, leaves with the customer a printed memorandum that the articles are accepted by the bailee with the understanding that the bailee is not responsible for damages in case of fire, there arises no contract releasing the bailee from liability for damage to the articles on account of fire, since there is no special agreement between the parties by which the bailor agrees to release the bailee from liability on account of the latter’s negligence. American Laundry Co. v. Hall, 27…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Riley & Co. v. London Guaranty & Accident Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  2. American Laundry v. HaulCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brown v. Five Points Parking CenterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Davidson v. RamsbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  3. Richter Bros. v. Atlantic Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  4. Palace Laundry Dry Cleaning Co. v. ColeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
  5. Scott v. Purser Truck Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API